A Concise Companion to Shakespeare on Screen (Concise by Diana E. Henderson

By Diana E. Henderson

This Concise spouse provides a multidisciplinary variety of ways to an enormous multimedia topic, Shakespeare on reveal. The book’s participants use the newest considering from cultural stories, communications, and comparative media, in discussion with literary, theatrical, and filmic techniques, so one can push the sphere ahead. they think about Shakespeare on reveal not just as a suite of accomplished items but in addition as a strategy. for that reason, the amount is geared up round issues reminiscent of authorship and collaboration, theatricality, intercourse and violence, globalization, and heritage. The Concise significant other bargains readers numerous obtainable routes into Shakespeare on monitor and helps additional examine of the topic during the inclusion of a bibliography, a chronological chart, and an intensive index. whilst, it serves as a focus for exploring basic concerns within the research of literature and tradition extra commonly, similar to the relationships among elite and pop culture, artwork and undefined, textual content, photo, and function.

Show description

Read Online or Download A Concise Companion to Shakespeare on Screen (Concise Companions to Literature and Culture) PDF

Similar shakespeare books

Work and Play on the Shakespearean Stage

Repeatedly, early glossy performs exhibit humans at paintings: shoemaking, grave-digging, appearing are only a few of the different types of labour that theatregoers can have noticeable depicted on level in 1599 and 1600. Tom Rutter demonstrates how such representations have been formed by means of the theatre's personal frustrating courting with paintings: actors earned their residing via taking part in, a convention that many thought of idle and illegitimate, whereas performs have been criticised for attractive servants and apprentices from their labour.

Shakespeare and Literary Theory (Oxford Shakespeare Topics)

How is it that the British literary critic Terry Eagleton can say that 'it is tough to learn Shakespeare with out feeling that he was once most likely conversant in the writings of Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Wittgenstein and Derrida', or that the Slovenian psychoanalytic theorist Slavoj Zizek can realize that 'Shakespeare surely had learn Lacan'?

Tragic conditions in Shakespeare : disinheriting the Globe

Paul A. Kottman deals a brand new and compelling figuring out of tragedy as obvious in 4 of Shakespeare’s mature performs― As you're keen on It, Hamlet, King Lear, and The Tempest. the writer pushes past conventional methods of pondering tragedy, framing his readings with easy questions which have been lacking from scholarship of the prior new release: Are we nonetheless moved by means of Shakespeare, and why?


Scott McMillin has further a brand new part on key occasions in scholarship and theater because the Nineteen Eighties (including foreign, political, feminist and postcolonial research) to this up to date version of Shakespeare's Othello. The impression of historicism and cultural materialism also are taken under consideration, and an entire description of performances of the play on level, movie and tv considers the difficulty of the interracial casting of major characters.

Additional info for A Concise Companion to Shakespeare on Screen (Concise Companions to Literature and Culture)

Sample text

Have no feelings then we say things to each other that don’t mean anything. But if we felt what we said – we’d say less and mean more. Pacino and Kimball appear transfixed by this speech and agree emphatically (chiming in several times off-camera). The man then turns to ask a businessman for change, and the camera lingers for a moment before a cut. The poignancy of the moment, the revelation that the most impassioned speech comes from the mouth of a beggar, appears to confirm the filmmakers’ belief that Shakespeare speaks to everyone at the precise moment that Pacino’s quest is thrown into relief as luxurious.

She also argues that the generic complexities of his plays anticipate the juxtaposition of disparate elements in modern films (Lindroth 2001: 113). The eclecticism of Taymor’s Titus has affinities with both Elizabethan theater practice and postmodern playfulness. This eclecticism may be read as “a sign of the play’s fragmented or disconnected discourse” and its “intermittent relation to contemporary modes of understanding,” but Taymor wanted (to adapt Worthen’s words) to signal “the universality and coherence of the [play as a] basic myth” – the signs of specific histories are subordinate to the authority of the text (Worthen 1997: 68).

It is standard in Shakespearean film criticism always to mention directors: simply providing a film title and date is not enough to establish which production of a given play is under consideration. But critics have gone further by focusing primarily on the input of the director, often privileging auteurs (like Olivier, Welles, Kurosawa, Kozintsev, Branagh) who fulfill the “author-function” as, in Worthen’s words, “stand-ins for Shakespeare” (1997: 60). Howlett, for example, is primarily concerned with how the “the director’s aesthetic awareness .

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.02 of 5 – based on 5 votes