All for Nothing: Hamlet's Negativity by Andrew Cutrofello
By Andrew Cutrofello
A specter is haunting philosophy -- the threat of Hamlet. Why is that this? Wherefore? What should still we do?Entering from degree left: the philosopher's Hamlet. The philosopher's Hamlet is a conceptual personality, performed via philosophers instead of actors. He plays no longer within the theater yet in the house of philosophical positions. In desirous about not anything, Andrew Cutrofello significantly examines the functionality background of this targeted function. The philosopher's Hamlet personifies negativity. In Shakespeare's play, Hamlet's speech and motion are routinely damaging; he's the depression Dane. so much could agree that he has not anything to be joyful approximately. Philosophers have taken Hamlet to include particular types of negativity that first got here into view in modernity. What the determine of the Sophist represented for Plato, Hamlet has represented for contemporary philosophers. Cutrofello analyzes 5 elements of Hamlet's negativity: his depression, unfavourable religion, nihilism, tarrying (which Cutrofello distinguishes from "delaying"), and nonexistence. alongside the best way, we meet Hamlet within the texts of Kant, Coleridge, Hegel, Marx, Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Freud, Russell, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Benjamin, Arendt, Schmitt, Lacan, Deleuze, Foucault, Derrida, Badiou, iek, and different philosophers. Whirling throughout a state of endless house, the philosopher's Hamlet is not anything if now not thought-provoking.
Read or Download All for Nothing: Hamlet's Negativity PDF
Similar shakespeare books
Many times, early smooth performs convey humans at paintings: shoemaking, grave-digging, appearing are only a number of the types of labour that theatregoers can have obvious depicted on degree in 1599 and 1600. Tom Rutter demonstrates how such representations have been formed via the theatre's personal challenging courting with paintings: actors earned their residing via enjoying, a tradition that many thought of idle and illegitimate, whereas performs have been criticised for attractive servants and apprentices from their labour.
How is it that the British literary critic Terry Eagleton can say that 'it is tough to learn Shakespeare with out feeling that he used to be most likely conversant in the writings of Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Wittgenstein and Derrida', or that the Slovenian psychoanalytic theorist Slavoj Zizek can become aware of that 'Shakespeare absolutely had learn Lacan'?
Paul A. Kottman bargains a brand new and compelling realizing of tragedy as noticeable in 4 of Shakespeare’s mature performs― As you're keen on It, Hamlet, King Lear, and The Tempest. the writer pushes past conventional methods of wondering tragedy, framing his readings with basic questions which have been lacking from scholarship of the earlier new release: Are we nonetheless moved by way of Shakespeare, and why?
Scott McMillin has extra a brand new part on key occasions in scholarship and theater because the Nineteen Eighties (including overseas, political, feminist and postcolonial research) to this up-to-date version of Shakespeare's Othello. The effect of historicism and cultural materialism also are taken into consideration, and a whole description of performances of the play on degree, movie and tv considers the problem of the interracial casting of major characters.
- Othello (Penguin)
- Shakespeare, Marlowe And The Politics Of France
- Shakespeare's Use of the Arts of Language
- Discovering Shakespeare: A New Guide to the Plays
- Studying Radio (Studying the Media)
- Online Customer Loyalty: Forecasting the Repatronage Behavior of Online Retail Customers (Kundenmanagement & Electronic Commerce)
Additional resources for All for Nothing: Hamlet's Negativity
I argue that this construct, despite having recognisable roots in early modern culture, would have been incomprehensible to Shakespeare and his contemporaries. And I argue that the subjectivist premise of ‘late Shakespeare’ – the assumption that the development of the work derives from and maps the development of the personality – fundamentally misrepresents the processes of production of early modern theatre. Developing these three fundamental points, I wish to argue that the particular understanding of late Shakespeare sustained by several generations of Shakespeareans, while somewhat belated in the general Introduction 23 history of the discourse of lateness, has in fact been instrumental in the construction and development of that discourse – that late Shakespeare has, in other words, both been constructed by and contributed to the construction of the idea of late writing – and, finally, that late Shakespeare has provided and continues to provide opportunities for creative artists, critics and theatre professionals self-consciously to construct their own careers by way of the idea of late writing.
105) 34 Shakespeare and the idea of late writing Late work thus attests to a freedom from material realities and restrictions that is possible only towards the end of the artist’s life. Context is entirely secondary, is in a sense simply left behind. For Neumann, the great artist’s life comprises three phases, the first two of which are shared by all artists: ‘He begins by responding to a creative impulse within him, which [. ] strives to find form of whatever kind. Then, maturing, he grows into the contingency of his epoch; through study, he becomes the heir and son of his cultural tradition’ (Neumann, 102).
To be sure’, he continues, ‘it perceives the disruptive force of subjectivity in the late 38 Shakespeare and the idea of late writing work of art. ). ). Thus, for Adorno, [t]he force of subjectivity in late works is the irascible gesture with which it leaves them. It bursts them asunder, not in order to express itself but, expressionlessly, to cast off the illusion of art. Of the works it leaves only fragments behind, communicating itself, as if in ciphers, only through the spaces it has violently vacated.