An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge by Noah Lemos
By Noah Lemos
Epistemology or the speculation of data is without doubt one of the cornerstones of analytic philosophy, and this publication offers a transparent and available advent to the topic. It discusses the various major theories of justification, together with foundationalism, coherentism, reliabilism, and advantage epistemology. different themes contain the Gettier challenge, internalism and externalism, skepticism, the matter of epistemic circularity, the matter of the criterion, a priori wisdom, and naturalized epistemology. meant essentially for college students taking a first-class in epistemology, this lucid and well-written textual content could additionally offer a great creation for a person drawn to figuring out extra approximately this significant zone of philosophy.
Part of the Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy sequence.
Read Online or Download An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge PDF
Similar epistemology books
The essays during this booklet current a posh topic on the middle of the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze, what in his final writing he referred to as easily "a existence. " They seize an issue that runs all through his work--his lengthy look for a brand new and stronger empiricism. introduced in his first publication, on David Hume, then setting out together with his early stories of Nietzsche and Bergson, the matter of an "empiricist conversion" turned important to Deleuze's paintings, specifically to his aesthetics and his belief of the paintings of cinema. within the new regime of conversation and information-machines with which he concept we're faced at the present time, he got here to think that the sort of conversion, such an empiricism, the sort of new artwork and will-to-art, used to be what we'd like so much. The final, probably minor query of "a life" is hence inseparable from Deleuze's extraordinary photo of philosophy now not as a knowledge we already own, yet as a natural immanence of what's but to return. possibly the complete exploitation of that photograph, from the most unique trajectories in modern philosophy, is additionally but to come.
The price of precise trust has performed a vital function in historical past of philosophy—consider Socrates’ slogan that the unexamined lifestyles isn't worthy dwelling, and Aristotle’s declare that everybody certainly desires knowledge—as good as in modern epistemology, the place questions on the worth of information have lately taken heart degree.
Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung. Von E. MACH Emer. Professor an der Unlversltlt Wlen. LEIPZIG Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth 1905. creation XIII On a few events Mach expressed the sentiment, specifically in his correspondence, that the United States was once the land of highbrow freedom and chance, the arrival frontier for a brand new radical empiricism that may support to scrub metaphysics out of philosophy.
- How to Know: A Practicalist Conception of Knowledge
- Mindreading Animals: The Debate over What Animals Know about Other Minds
- The Imposition of Method: A Study of Descartes and Locke
- Aristotle on the Apparent Good: Perception, Phantasia, Thought, and Desire (Oxford Aristotle Studies Series)
Extra resources for An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge
In Cases 1 and 2, Smith has evidence for, and is justified in believing, some false proposition. From this falsehood he deduces a true proposition. On the basis of this inference he acquires a justified true belief, but not knowledge. What these cases show is that one can satisfy the requirements of the JTB account of knowledge, that one can meet the requirements laid out in D3, and yet fail to have knowledge. Gettier notes that the counter-examples he presents presuppose two things about epistemic justification.
Again, this is because there is a true proposition which is such that if Smith believed it, then he would not be justified in believing (h). If Smith were justified in believing the true proposition, that Jones is merely pretending to own a Ford, then he would not be justified in believing the false proposition (f), Jones owns a Ford, and, consequently, he would not be justified in believing (h). Since Smith’s belief in (h) does not meet condition (4) in D8, D8 implies that Smith does not know (h).
8 In the epistemological case, what one is justified in believing depends on one’s total evidence. So too, it would seem that in the ethical case, the right action depends on one’s total circumstances. Just as one’s reasons for performing certain actions can be defeated by further considerations, so too one’s reasons for believing various things can be defeated by further evidence. In this chapter, we have distinguished propositional knowledge from acquaintance knowledge and ‘‘how to’’ knowledge.